Header image

Tech news

Trending

Differences In UX Demands Of A Desktop And Mobile App For A SaaS Product

25/11/2022

310

While it was more common for individuals and institutions to buy software in the earlier days, the concept of software as a service isn’t that new either. And as smartphones get smarter and more accessible, many product companies are shifting their focus to this ballooning market to sustain and increase profit.

But even though many have increased revenue by enhancing their mobile apps, some companies are excelling thanks to a good desktop app UX. Mobile apps often shine when it comes to daily life products for the individual end user while desktop apps encapsulate stunning collaboration and productivity solutions.

In fact, a recent StatCounter study put desktop traffic at 56.51%, with mobile traffic at 50.48%. Many other reports show that there’s still a roughly 60-40 split in mobile and desktop traffic. Clearly, both market segments are here to stay, so let’s examine the differences between UX design for desktop and UX design for mobile:

UI Details

One of the major differences is that desktop users are more comfortable with having plenty of items fixed on a single UI screen/window. In contrast, mobile users have limited screen space, and many use their thumbs more than any other finger, so you can hardly get away with a cluttered UI.

Not only does it look overwhelming, but it also increases the chances of a user tapping the wrong button/option. Unfortunately, there are no straightforward solutions to this challenge. You’re likely to tuck a feature/function two or more screens away, which users won’t be so happy about.

Luckily, some designs enable you to have retractable menus that slide into place and then slide away. You also have the option to create circular icon menus that appear when you hold down a button for a while. Ultimately, you should have a navigation option that makes it easy to go to the previous page or return to the general menu.

UI Details_1

Source: Freepik

UI Details_2

Source: Freepik

You’ll also need to include a button for the most important action a user can take at that stage in their journey. If it’s the opening page, this could be a signup button; if it’s a category page, it could be an “add to cart” button or a “buy” button if it’s the checkout page. Whatever the CTA is, it should be visible. The user shouldn’t have to first scroll down the page. It should also be within the thumb zone, so ensure it’s wide enough.

UI Details_3

Source: Freepik

UX design for mobile should also consider the unique gestures like swiping, tilting and shaking that can make a mobile app more fun to use, not forgetting the use of haptic feedback to respond to a user’s command.

Performance

Ideally, both desktop and mobile app versions should be as smooth and fast as possible. However, when you consider the context in which they operate and the behind-the-scenes work involved in making apps faster, you realize that you might need to put more emphasis on one of them.

Mobile apps are more likely to be run on devices with limited RAM, storage space and processing power. Additionally, users are more likely to travel with mobile devices to remote areas where internet connectivity may be poorer.

Performance

Photo by ThisisEngineering RAEng on Unsplash

This is why it is essential to optimize mobile apps so they can still work fine when low on resources. From memory allocation to caching, reliance on CDNs and compression for lighter media file versions, offline modes, variable streaming bitrates and data template reuse, there are various techniques you can use to achieve higher mobile app performance. Additionally, don’t forget to test on as many devices and OS versions as possible.

Personalization

Many software users want to feel like the product was made just for them, and it deeply understands them. In the past, personalization came in the form of changeable skins, fonts and colors. Later, it advanced to more important features like changing languages, currencies and measurement systems.

However, personalization has to evolve even further. For instance, if the user has enabled your mobile app to access their location, can it suggest the perfect playlist when it detects that they are by the beach or at a riverside campsite or safari lodge.

Personalization

Source: Unsplash

Can your shopping app switch to suggestions for sweaters and cold-weather clothes when the user is in a cold region? Will your food app point them to the places with the best hot beverages and confectioneries? Personalization covers several areas, including the way a person types and uses emojis, the order in which they browse pages, how they use search bars and more.

Unlike desktop apps which run on devices like work computers that stay in the same place and are shared, or laptops that usually move between work and home, a mobile app often runs on a device that spends most of its time with one person, going everywhere with them. This is why making mobile app versions as adaptable to the user as possible is crucial.

Security and Customer Support

On the security front, mobility creates more headaches since it increases the chances of a user losing a device or connecting to an unsecured public network, among other scenarios. This means you should augment mobile apps with more security options, such as fingerprint locks, face ID and other approaches that a mobile device’s native hardware can allow.

On a deeper level, developers can look into code obfuscation, “root,” and “jailbreak detection ” to further protect against attack techniques that take advantage of the mobile app-specific architectural and operational characteristics.

When it comes to customer support, mobile app UX designers can look into things like the ability to screenshot an error message page and quickly submit it via live chat or tap a call button to speak to an agent.

Security and Customer Support

Image by Freepik

Another vital customer support area is self-help. Remember, desktop app versions have the advantage since there’s more space to display a help article column alongside the actual screen/dashboard where the user is working. They can also properly display video demos and offer an Info view where you see what a button or other element does by hovering the cursor over it.

That said, mobile app UX designers need to find ways to condense knowledge bases and other self-help materials within the app to simplify the journey from learning to applying. They can also use GIFs to strike a middle-ground between heavy videos and static images when delivering demos.

Wrapping Up

All-in-all, it’s prudent not to look at the desktop as outdated. Instead, focus more on what they easily accommodate, then figure out how to emulate that on mobile devices. As always, it helps to work with a team of professionals conversant with the nuances of developing and delivering desktop and mobile SaaS apps. You can start this journey by contacting the SupremeTech team for a free consultation on how we bring software ideas to life for our clients.

Related Blog

cross-platform mobile development with golang and the pros and cons of building native apps with golang

Knowledge

+0

    Cross-Platform Mobile Development with Golang: Build Native Apps

    Over the past few years, cross-platform solutions have gained popularity for their ability to streamline development efforts. Golang proves to be an optimal language for cross-platform mobile development, offering developers a powerful toolset and robust frameworks. In this article, we explore the use of Golang in cross-platform mobile development and delve into frameworks like Gomobile and Fyne that enable developers to build native mobile apps using Golang. The Rise of Cross-Platform Mobile Development Cross-platform mobile development allows developers to write code once and deploy it across multiple platforms like iOS or Android. With the diversity of mobile operating systems, cross-platform solutions have become increasingly popular among developers and businesses alike. Golang for Cross-Platform Development Golang's simplicity, performance, and concurrency features make it well-suited for mobile app development. Its efficient support for multiple platforms enable developers to write code once and deploy it across various devices seamlessly. Additionally, Golang's static typing and error checking contribute to the reliability and stability of mobile applications. Frameworks for Cross-Platform Mobile Development with Golang Gomobile Gomobile is an open-source project developed by the Go team at Google. It allows developers to build and deploy native mobile apps using Golang. Gomobile enables developers to write platform-specific code in Go and access platform-specific APIs, such as those provided by iOS and Android. The framework provides tools for compiling Go code into native libraries and generating bindings for mobile platforms, facilitating seamless integration with native code. Fyne Fyne is a lightweight and user-friendly framework for building cross-platform graphical interfaces in Go. While primarily focused on desktop applications, Fyne supports mobile platforms through its responsive design and flexible layout system. Developers can create mobile apps using Fyne's declarative UI components and build custom interfaces that adapt to different screen sizes and orientations. Fyne's simplicity and ease of use make it an attractive option for Golang developers seeking to build native mobile apps. Advantages of Building Native Apps with Golang Performance: Golang's efficient runtime and compiled nature result in fast and responsive mobile applications, providing users with a smooth and seamless experience.Code Reusability: Golang's cross-platform capabilities allow developers to reuse a significant portion of their codebase across different platforms, reducing development time and effort.Access to Native APIs: Frameworks like Gomobile enable developers to access platform-specific APIs and functionalities. As a result, it allows for seamless integration with device hardware and native platform features.Community Support: Golang's active and supportive community provides developers with access to resources, libraries, and documentation. Furthermore, the dynamic community facilitates the development process and encouraging collaboration. Challenges and Considerations While Golang offers several advantages for cross-platform mobile development, there are also some challenges and considerations to keep in mind: Platform Limitations: Cross-platform frameworks may have limitations in accessing certain platform-specific features or APIs. Sometimes it requires developers to find workarounds or use native code for certain functionalities.Learning Curve: Developers may need to familiarize themselves with the syntax and conventions of Golang.Performance Optimization: Developers may need to optimize their code and implement best practices to ensure optimal performance on mobile devices with varying hardware specifications. Conclusion Cross-platform mobile development with Golang offers developers a powerful and efficient approach to building native mobile apps. Frameworks like Gomobile and Fyne provide developers with the tools and resources they need to create responsive, performant, and feature-rich applications for iOS and Android platforms. By leveraging Golang's advantages, developers can unlock new opportunities and deliver high-quality mobile experiences to users around the world. If you're considering Golang for your development project, let us help! Contact SupremeTech for your custom consultancy!

    12/03/2024

    36

    Knowledge

    +0

      12/03/2024

      36

      Cross-Platform Mobile Development with Golang: Build Native Apps

      automated deployment for golang applications

      How-To

      Knowledge

      +0

        Automating Deployment of GoLang Applications

        Welcome back, tech fellows! Happy Lunar New Year to you all! Looking back on the past projects we've done, we realized that even big companies are struggling with some time-consuming and unbelievably outdated deployment process. Believe me there's plenty of them out there. I wonder whether it's hard to adapt new procedures or automation is out of reach? Neither should make sense. In this article, we'll explore strategies, tools, and best practices for automating the deployment of GoLang applications to various environments. Deploying GoLang applications across different environments, such as development, staging, and production, can be a complex and error-prone process. Automating this deployment process ensures consistency and reliability, reduces human error, and speeds up the delivery pipeline. Introduction Deploying GoLang applications involves tasks like building binaries, managing dependencies, configuring environment-specific settings, and deploying artifacts to target environments. Manual deployment processes are tedious, error-prone, and time-consuming. Automation streamlines these tasks, enabling teams to deliver software faster and with greater confidence. 1. Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Pipelines Implementing CI/CD pipelines automates the entire deployment workflow, from code commit to production deployment. Tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI/CD, or CircleCI can be configured to trigger builds, run tests, and deploy GoLang applications automatically. Utilizing GoLang's robust testing framework ensures that only quality code gets deployed. 2. Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Using tools like Terraform or Pulumi, infrastructure can be provisioned and configured programmatically. GoLang's rich ecosystem of libraries and its concurrency model make it well-suited for defining infrastructure in code. Infrastructure changes can be version-controlled, audited, and applied consistently across different environments. 3. Containerization and Orchestration: Containerizing GoLang applications using Docker simplifies deployment and ensures consistency across environments. Kubernetes, with its declarative approach to managing containerized applications, can automate deployment, scaling, and rolling updates. GoLang's lightweight footprint makes it ideal for containerized environments. 4. Configuration Management: Automating configuration management ensures that GoLang applications behave consistently across environments. Tools like Consul, etcd, or Kubernetes ConfigMaps can store configuration settings external to the application code. GoLang's ability to parse various configuration formats and its strong typing facilitate seamless integration with configuration management systems. 5. Blue-Green Deployment and Canary Releases: Implementing blue-green deployment or canary release strategies reduces deployment risk and enables gradual rollout of new features. GoLang's support for graceful shutdowns and zero-downtime deployments ensures uninterrupted service during deployments. Automation tools can facilitate switching traffic between blue and green environments or gradually increasing traffic to canary releases. Conclusion Automating the deployment process of GoLang applications to various environments is essential for achieving consistency and reliability in software delivery. By leveraging CI/CD pipelines, Infrastructure as Code, containerization, configuration management, and deployment strategies like blue-green and canary releases, teams can deploy GoLang applications confidently and efficiently, ultimately delivering value to end-users faster. Contact us for a fast and productive development procedures!

        23/02/2024

        129

        How-To

        +1

        • Knowledge

        23/02/2024

        129

        Automating Deployment of GoLang Applications

        is react native good for mobile app development

        Knowledge

        +0

          Is React Native Good for Mobile App Development? A Simple Guide

          Mobile app development has evolved rapidly, and developers often find themselves faced with the decision of choosing the right framework for their projects. Among the various options available, React Native has gained significant popularity. But is React Native really a good choice for mobile app development? Let's break it down in simple terms. Understanding React Native React Native 101: React Native is an open-source framework developed by Facebook that allows developers to build mobile applications using the familiar syntax of React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. The key advantage? You can write your code once and run it on both iOS and Android platforms, saving time and effort. Find out more about the general pros and cons of using React Native for web app development. When to Choose React Native 1. Prototyping and MVPs: If you're in the early stages of app development and need to quickly validate your ideas, React Native is a solid choice. Its rapid development capabilities make it ideal for creating prototypes and minimum viable products (MVPs) that can be tested on both iOS and Android platforms. 2. Limited Development Resources: For teams with developers skilled in JavaScript, React Native provides a familiar environment. This is particularly advantageous if you have a smaller team or a tight budget, as it allows you to leverage existing skills rather than investing in learning platform-specific languages. 3. Content-Driven Apps: Apps that heavily rely on displaying content, such as news apps or social media platforms, can benefit from React Native's efficiency. The framework's ability to handle complex UIs and its performance optimization make it suitable for content-centric applications. 4. Apps Requiring Regular Updates: React Native's hot reloading feature makes it an excellent choice for apps that require frequent updates. Developers can make changes on the fly without disrupting the user experience, making it easier to implement improvements and fix bugs promptly. 5. Small to Medium-Sized Apps: While React Native can handle large-scale applications, it truly shines in the development of small to medium-sized apps. Its simplicity and efficiency make it an excellent fit for projects where a lightweight framework is preferred. Considerations and Limitations 1. Complex Animations and Graphics: While React Native is excellent for most UI interactions, highly complex animations and graphics might benefit from a more native approach. In such cases, a blend of React Native and native modules might be necessary. 2. Platform-Specific Requirements: If your app heavily relies on platform-specific features, you might find yourself writing native modules or components. While React Native tries to be a one-size-fits-all solution, there are instances where platform-specific code is unavoidable. 3. Learning Curve for Native Modules: When dealing with complex functionalities or integrations, you might need to dip into native modules. This could require knowledge of Swift or Java, adding a bit of a learning curve for developers primarily familiar with JavaScript. Conclusion In the ever-expanding landscape of mobile app development, React Native stands out as a versatile and efficient framework. Its cross-platform capabilities, along with a plethora of benefits, make it a compelling choice for many projects. However, like any tool, it's crucial to understand its strengths and limitations. So, is React Native good for mobile app development? Absolutely, especially when it aligns with your project requirements and development goals. For rapid prototyping, cross-platform compatibility, and content-centric applications, React Native proves to be an excellent companion. As with any development decision, it's about finding the right tool for the job, and React Native certainly deserves a spot in the toolbox.

          15/01/2024

          448

          Knowledge

          +0

            15/01/2024

            448

            Is React Native Good for Mobile App Development? A Simple Guide

            pros and cons of using react native in web app development

            Knowledge

            +0

              Pros and Cons of Using React Native in Web App Development

              As a seasoned React developer navigating the dynamic landscape of web app development, the choice of frameworks can significantly impact project outcomes. React Native, originally designed for mobile app development, has increasingly found its way into the realm of web applications. Let's dissect the pros and cons of employing React Native in web app development with a straightforward lens. Pros of using React Native **1. Cross-Platform Development:** React Native's hallmark is its ability to facilitate cross-platform development. This is a game-changer for web apps seeking a unified codebase for both desktop and mobile experiences. The advantages are evident in projects like Facebook's own Ads Manager, where a shared codebase expedites development and maintenance. **2. Reusable Components:** The component-based architecture of React Native isn't just for show. It promotes code reusability and consistency across different parts of your web app. For instance, a custom UI component developed for a specific feature can seamlessly find its way into other sections, ensuring a uniform look and feel. **3. Familiarity with React:** For developers well-versed in React, the transition to React Native for web app development is remarkably smooth. The ability to leverage existing knowledge and skills in JavaScript and React principles expedites the learning curve, fostering a more efficient development process. **4. Community Support:** The React Native community is robust, offering a plethora of resources, libraries, and third-party tools. For web app developers, this translates into an abundance of solutions and best practices readily available. A supportive community ensures that challenges are met with collective knowledge and innovation. Cons of using React Native **1. Limited Access to Native Modules:** While React Native provides access to a wide array of native modules, it may lack support for certain platform-specific features. For example, if your web app requires intricate functionalities deeply rooted in native capabilities, relying solely on React Native might present limitations. **2. Web-Specific Performance Challenges:** React Native, initially designed for mobile environments, may not seamlessly translate to optimal performance in web browsers. Rendering complex UIs and handling animations can pose challenges, as the framework's strengths lie more in the mobile app domain. **3. Learning Curve for React Native Web:** Despite React Native's familiarity for React developers, adapting it for web app development involves a learning curve. Navigating the nuances of React Native Web, the library extension for web applications, might require additional effort. This could potentially impact development timelines. **4. Limited Ecosystem for Web:** While React Native boasts a mature ecosystem for mobile development, its offerings for web app development are relatively nascent. Developers might encounter scenarios where specific web-related functionalities are not as well-supported or documented as their mobile counterparts. Navigating the Decision Scenario 1: Building a Cross-Platform App with Unified Codebase Consider React Native for a project where a cross-platform web app with a unified codebase is a priority. For instance, an e-commerce platform aiming for consistency across desktop and mobile interfaces could benefit significantly from React Native. Scenario 2: High Dependency on Platform-Specific Features If your web app heavily relies on platform-specific features or demands high-performance graphics, consider evaluating alternatives. Directly using native frameworks or exploring hybrid solutions tailored for web might be more suitable. Scenario 3: Leveraging Existing React Skills for Web Development If your team is well-versed in React and wishes to leverage existing skills for web app development, React Native becomes a pragmatic choice. This is particularly relevant for projects where a rapid development cycle is crucial. Conclusion: In the nuanced landscape of web app development, React Native brings both advantages and challenges. Its cross-platform capabilities and code-sharing benefits can be instrumental in specific scenarios, while considerations such as performance optimization and access to native features must be weighed. Ultimately, the decision to use React Native for web app development hinges on project requirements, development goals, and the unique characteristics of the application. A pragmatic approach involves assessing the strengths and limitations outlined here, aligning them with the project's needs, and making an informed decision that best serves the development objectives.

              14/01/2024

              491

              Knowledge

              +0

                14/01/2024

                491

                Pros and Cons of Using React Native in Web App Development

                Post banner imagePost banner image
                Customize software background

                Want to customize a software for your business?